Skip to main content

Metric details

Every pilot's reading on every behaviour, family by family.

Analysis computed

best: could be chance (0.42)

best: clear pattern (0.65)

#PilotOut-climbCore sLeaveRateKept%TopOut%Round
1Dustan Hansen76 (17 shared climbs)73 (16 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.6 (14 climbs ≥ 90 s)60 (3/5 circling bouts led to climbs)82 (mean on-course altitude 50% of band)0.18 (121 circles, 100% left)
2Dean Bayly83 (9 shared climbs)91 (7 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (5 climbs ≥ 90 s)43 (3/7 circling bouts led to climbs)103 (mean on-course altitude 72% of band)0.14 (77 circles, 99% left)
3Donny Gardner82 (12 shared climbs)98 (12 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.6 (11 climbs ≥ 90 s)67 (4/6 circling bouts led to climbs)80 (mean on-course altitude 51% of band)0.18 (144 circles, 100% left)
4Nicole Forrester85 (5 shared climbs)52 (9 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (5 climbs ≥ 90 s)44 (4/9 circling bouts led to climbs)43 (mean on-course altitude 36% of band)0.21 (120 circles, 96% left)
5Mike Estcourt84 (15 shared climbs)50 (11 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (8 climbs ≥ 90 s)50 (3/6 circling bouts led to climbs)79 (mean on-course altitude 52% of band)0.15 (113 circles, 44% left)
6Amber Tsai78 (7 shared climbs)34 (12 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (8 climbs ≥ 90 s)40 (2/5 circling bouts led to climbs)25 (mean on-course altitude 25% of band)0.21 (145 circles, 55% left)
7Gordon Bishop83 (5 shared climbs)56 (3 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)0.13 (45 circles, 93% left)
8Mark Tyminski52 (29 shared climbs)15 (12 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (3 climbs ≥ 90 s)0.14 (197 circles, 82% left)
9James McGinty55 (10 shared climbs)78 (1 climb ≥ 60 s)1.5 (1 climb ≥ 90 s)2 (mean on-course altitude -6% of band)0.16 (18 circles, 94% left)
10Patrick Honey71 (17 shared climbs)37 (6 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.2 (4 climbs ≥ 90 s)50 (2/4 circling bouts led to climbs)13 (mean on-course altitude 17% of band)0.18 (112 circles, 59% left)
11James Atkinson14 (1 shared climb)120 (1 climb ≥ 60 s)0.3 (1 climb ≥ 90 s) (2 circles, 50% left)
12Jakota Cummings62 (21 shared climbs)50 (4 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)0.15 (54 circles, 98% left)
13Hayden Emms52 (1 climb ≥ 60 s)0.7 (1 climb ≥ 90 s)0.19 (10 circles, 100% left)
14Curtis Greenwood37 (22 shared climbs)47 (18 climbs ≥ 60 s)0.6 (12 climbs ≥ 90 s)40 (4/10 circling bouts led to climbs)74 (mean on-course altitude 66% of band)0.33 (33 circles, 64% left)
15Jason Lannstrom75 (13 shared climbs)12 (3 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.6 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)0.18 (41 circles, 100% left)
16Anthony Meechan61 (26 shared climbs)45 (5 climbs ≥ 60 s)2.3 (2 climbs ≥ 90 s)61 (mean on-course altitude 47% of band)0.19 (63 circles, 98% left)
17Mark Wallace63 (18 shared climbs)52 (8 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (5 climbs ≥ 90 s)0.20 (60 circles, 100% left)

Share of lift turned in that was kept as a climb

Measured in percent · no expected direction

How selective the pilot is about the lift they stop for. Each period of circling of 30 s or more after the start counts as lift that the pilot sampled. If the period overlaps a detected thermal, the pilot kept that lift. If it does not, they turned a few circles and left it. The value is the percentage kept. A low value means they are selective. A high value means they keep almost every climb they turn in. There is no expected direction: selection wins on a strong day and wastes time on a weak one.

Acceptance by hour

HourMedian accepted (%)pilots
675
306
257
252

Median per-pilot acceptance %, bucketed by the hour (competition time zone).

How round and consistent the circles were

Measured in ratio · no expected direction

Whether the pilot flies clean, repeatable circles, or moves around the thermal. We fit each detected circle by least squares. The RMS fit error divided by the fitted radius measures how round the turn was. The value is the median over all of the circles of the pilot. A lower value means smoother and more consistent turns. There is no expected direction: a rough trace can be a pilot chasing a drifting or broken core rather than a pilot circling badly.

Turn direction across the field: 83% left (1355 circles).

best: could be chance (0.62)

best: too few pilots (0.80)

#PilotFloor%LowSaveskm/climbSearch%
1Dustan Hansen51 (2 descents, lowest 41% of band)0.05.6 (mean shared-climb pctile 65%)16
2Dean Bayly74 (3 descents, lowest 73% of band)0.04.5 (mean shared-climb pctile 59%)28
3Donny Gardner31 (2 descents, lowest 25% of band)0.02.3 (mean shared-climb pctile 62%)24
4Nicole Forrester1.0 (deepest save from 13% of band)3.2 (mean shared-climb pctile 54%)40
5Mike Estcourt47 (3 descents, lowest 2% of band)2.0 (deepest save from 0% of band)41
6Amber Tsai1.0 (deepest save from -11% of band)56
7Gordon Bishop0.047
8Mark Tyminski0.025
9James McGinty0.061
10Patrick Honey0.074
11James Atkinson0.0100
12Jakota Cummings
13Hayden Emms0.0100
14Curtis Greenwood79 (5 descents, lowest 27% of band)0.050
15Jason Lannstrom0.025
16Anthony Meechan-48 (3 descents, lowest -50% of band)0.058
17Mark Wallace0.0100

Share of race time spent hunting for the next climb

Measured in percent · lower is better

Time that goes into neither a climb nor progress down the course. This is the time spent to find lift, to stay up, and to decide what to do next. The value is the share of the speed-section time, from the start to ESS or to the landing, in which the pilot neither climbed in a thermal nor glided with real net speed. A lower value means less time lost between climbs.

Speed-section phase shares, field p25/median/p75: climb 0/21/33% · glide 11/24/45% · search 27/49/64%

best: could be chance (0.11)

best: too few pilots (0.40)